// the library
You don't run these. MasterMind does.
Just describe what you want. MasterMind recognizes it and applies the right skill automatically. No commands to memorize. Prefer to be explicit? Call any of them by name,“debug this”,“use the code-reviewer”. These are the workflows it draws on; bigger expert roles, like design or code review, run as separate agents.
skills/
you just talk, these fire automatically
init
set MasterMind up for your project in a few quick steps
help
the full menu: what it does and how to use each part
build
design → implement → verify → review → learn, end to end
debug
structured, evidence-first debugging: not guessing
performance
measure → find the real bottleneck → fix → verify
qa
prove it works end-to-end; adds tests only if you want them
report
a shareable write-up of a cycle: opt-in, off by default
interview
agree what is being built (and what is not) before code
learn
learn your real stack + check its own assumptions
prototype
a fast throwaway experiment to settle one unknown
route
load only the files a task needs: fewer tokens, faster
prompt
sharpen a vague ask into a clear, AI-ready prompt
signature
learn your team's real coding style → rules it follows
persona
write in a named engineer’s documented public style
explain
AI-friendly docs so any model understands your package
quarantine
a private space for sensitive project data: never published
levelup
capture lessons · refresh standards · bootstrap a field
lint
checks MasterMind's own files for bloat and contradictions
double-check
interrogate a claim before you hand it over
deprecate
remove, migrate, retire: safely and provably
roadmap
a decision map that survives months of work
handoff
a handoff that survives a context reset